Yexin Ma vs Anna Sinclair Rogers Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do the players compare in second serve performance recently? Ma secures 37.89% of such points, while Rogers wins 41.75%, indicating a slight edge for Rogers in second serve proficiency.
• When it comes to return games, Ma captures 47.56% of the opponents' second-serve points, whereas Rogers edges ahead with 48.79% efficiency. For first-serve returns, Ma lags at 30.76%, with Rogers leading slightly at 33.49%.
• Under high-pressure situations, notably breakpoints, Ma saves 46.59% of these, with Rogers outperforming at 50.81% effectiveness.
• Over the past year, Ma boasts a match win rate of 51.47% (35 wins out of 68 matches), whereas Rogers has a superior win rate of 63.01% (46 wins out of 73 matches), highlighting better overall performance by Rogers.
• On surfaces, Ma's peak performance is on Clay (56% win rate), in contrast, Rogers excels on indoor hard courts (67% win rate) but underperforms on Clay (43%).
• In matches primarily played in Challenger/ITF tournaments over $10K, Ma wins 54.55% (30 of 55), while Rogers achieves 63.01% (46 of 73), indicating Rogers' better adaptation to competitive tournament levels.
• Regarding the quality of opponents, Ma faces stronger opponents on average (ranked 322.57) than Rogers, who often competes against lower-ranked players (average rank 412.86).
• What about deciding set performances? Ma clinches 45% of these challenging scenarios in the past year, but remarkably, Rogers triumphs in 71% of such sets.
• For break point conversion metrics, Ma converts 31.63% of opportunities, while Rogers successfully converts 40.53% of these crucial chances.

Editorial Prediction (July 30, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the data reveals insights into each player's strengths and vulnerabilities. In recent second serve point performance, Rogers slightly outshines Ma, which aligns with higher match prediction accuracy.

Rogers also holds a slight edge in return game statistics, particularly in both first and second serve returns. Additionally, Rogers has a notably higher conversion rate for breakpoints and better performance under pressure, as seen in break point saves.

In the past year, Rogers' win-loss record is significantly better than Ma's, suggesting greater consistency at competitive levels. Despite Ma encountering higher-ranked opponents, Rogers' overall stats are marginally better.

Considering deciding set performances—a crucial factor for live matches—Rogers is significantly more successful, boasting a 71% win rate compared to Ma’s 45%.

Considering all statistical elements, Rogers emerges as the likely favorite to win the upcoming tennis match.